NCIER®

Grade Level Scope

17 claims on pp. 22–148 (fact 11, statement 1, conjecture 2, definition 3).

Claims about Grade Level Scope

Fact [V] p028-13

High school principals: 48 percent said external teams do not know much about school environments or

Sample (column N undeterminable) · High school principals served by an external BTAM team

They were more likely than their elementary and middle school counterparts to believe that external teams do not know much about school environments and/or youth populations (48 percent said this) and also less likely than middle school principals to believe that these teams have access to a broader variety of service providers.

p. 28 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 28 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 28 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p043-06

Secondary schools more likely than elementary to have more varied personnel on BTAM teams

For example, secondary (middle and high) schools were more likely to have a greater variety of personnel on their teams—including other school administrators beyond the principal, school-based law enforcement, counselors, and social workers—than their elementary counterparts.

p. 43 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 43 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 43 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Conjecture [V] p064-03

More secondary than elementary schools have substance use treatment, likely because illicit use rise

Unsurprisingly, more secondary schools have access to substance use treatment options than elementary schools, likely because the percentage of youth reporting they use any illicit substance increases with age (National Institute on Drug Abuse [NIDA], 2023).

p. 64 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 64 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 64 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Conjecture [V] p066-04

Responses suggest teams rarely use exclusionary discipline, especially at elementary level, but do s

Although principals’ survey responses suggest that BTAM teams rarely use exclusionary discipline measures—especially at the elementary level—they show that teams do still use these options (see Figure 9.1).

p. 66 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 66 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 66 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p066-12

Elementary schools were particularly likely to say they never use exclusionary discipline

Our data also show that elementary schools—whose BTAM teams likely deal with relatively less serious student behavior compared with secondary schools—were particularly likely to say they never use exclusionary discipline for students referred to a BTAM team.

p. 66 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 66 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 66 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p066-14

Some elementary schools said their teams have expelled or referred students to law enforcement with

However, although these practices are less common in elementary schools compared with middle and high schools, some elementary schools said that their BTAM teams have expelled or referred students to law enforcement with some regularity.

p. 66 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 66 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 66 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p077-11

Secondary principals most often named an administrator, then a teacher (Scenarios I and K)

Secondary school principals most commonly identified a school administrator as the initial decisionmaker; the second most commonly selected option was a teacher (e.g., in Scenario I [history of misbehavior and academic issues] and Scenario K [physical altercation]).

p. 77 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 77 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 77 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page

Top

Find the Perfect Training Class For You