NCIER®

Report page 64

Report page 64 with the extracted claims highlighted
Click the page to enlarge. Highlighted passages match the claims listed alongside.

Claims on this page

Fact [V] p064-01

BTAM teams almost universally have a variety of intervention options available

Schools’ BTAM teams almost universally have a variety of intervention options available to them when it comes to intervening with a student assessed as posing a risk of harm to themself or others.

p. 64 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p064-02

Substance use treatment is the only option not universally available: 79 percent of schools have it

Sample (N = 1384) · Teams answering intervention/safety plan components question

The only intervention not universally available across responding schools—but still widely available—is substance use treatment; 79 percent of schools have this intervention as an available option.

p. 64 · NCIER Claim Map
Conjecture [V] p064-03

More secondary than elementary schools have substance use treatment, likely because illicit use rise

Unsurprisingly, more secondary schools have access to substance use treatment options than elementary schools, likely because the percentage of youth reporting they use any illicit substance increases with age (National Institute on Drug Abuse [NIDA], 2023).

p. 64 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p064-04

Virtually all schools use trusted-adult programming: 53 percent often, 42 percent sometimes, 4 perce

Sample (N = 1384) · Teams answering intervention/safety plan components question

For example, virtually all schools use programming to build trusted relationships with adults, but the frequency they use these interventions varies: 53 percent report using this often; 42 percent report sometimes; and 4 percent report rarely using it as an option.

p. 64 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p064-05

91 percent have the option to permanently remove students, yet 30 percent of schools never use it

Sample (N = 1384) · Teams answering intervention/safety plan components question

As an example, while 91 percent of principals indicate that their BTAM team has the option to permanently remove students from school via expulsion or relocation, 30 percent of schools report never using this option.

p. 64 · NCIER Claim Map
Conjecture [V] p064-08

Differences in frequency are likely related to the types of cases referred to BTAM teams

These differences in frequency with which schools use specific interventions are likely related to the types of cases referred to BTAM teams—that is, incidents that involve substance use may be rarer as part of the case types referred to BTAM teams, therefore leading schools to only rarely include such treatment as part of an intervention plan.

p. 64 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p064-14

Intervention options vary: skill-building, trusted adults, special education, counseling, removal

As shown in Figure 9.1, these options vary and can include skill-building services, programs geared toward building relationships with trusted adults, special education supports, mental health counseling, or temporary removal from school (e.g., suspension).

p. 64 · NCIER Claim Map

Top

Find the Perfect Training Class For You