NCIER®

Report page 49

Report page 49 with the extracted claims highlighted
Click the page to enlarge. Highlighted passages match the claims listed alongside.

Claims on this page

Fact [V] p049-01

Forty-three percent of schools have a standard meeting schedule for BTAM teams

Sample (N = 1401) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

Forty-three percent of schools have a standard meeting schedule for their BTAM teams.

p. 49 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p049-02

No convergence: 9 percent weekly, 8 biweekly, 19 monthly, 6 percent every two to three months

Sample (N = 1401) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

However, there was no convergence among these schools about how often meetings occurred: 9 percent met once per week, 8 percent met once every two weeks, 19 percent met once per month, and 6 percent met every two to three months.

p. 49 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p049-03

The remaining 57 percent of schools met irregularly on an as-needed basis

Sample (N = 1401) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

The remaining 57 percent of schools met irregularly on an as-needed basis depending on their case load.

p. 49 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p049-04

Urban, large, large-district and majority-students-of-color schools more likely to have a standard s

Principals in urban schools, large schools, large districts, and schools serving a majority of students of color—categories that are highly overlapping—were particularly likely to report having a standard meeting schedule.

p. 49 · NCIER Claim Map
Conclusion [V] p049-06

Stable funding is often a driver of whether a program can be sustained

Whether a program has stable funding is often a driver for whether it can be sustained over time, because funding instability (and the competition of other priorities for funds) can put programs at risk.

p. 49 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p049-08

Forming a BTAM team does not require funding beyond total school or district program funding

Forming a BTAM team per se does not require funding outside total program funding for a school or district, which already covers the salaries of such key BTAM team personnel as administrators and counselors.

p. 49 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p049-09

Most schools (57 percent) implement BTAM without dedicated staff or additional funds

Sample (N = 1376) · Teams answering community support / challenges / processes / training questions

Most schools (57 percent) said their BTAM programs are implemented without dedicated staff or additional funds beyond the levels already available.

p. 49 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p049-12

BTAM funding comes from various sources including school or district general fund budgets

Funding for school BTAM programs comes from various sources, including through aforementioned school or district general fund budgets that also fund the positions of key team members.

p. 49 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p049-16

About one-quarter of principals (23 percent) reported dedicated BTAM funding in budget

Sample (N = 1376) · Teams answering community support / challenges / processes / training questions

Only about one-quarter of principals (23 percent) said their BTAM teams were supported with dedicated funding in their school or district budget.

p. 49 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p049-17

19 percent of schools did not know how their BTAM programs were funded

Sample (N = 1376) · Official BTAM teams answering Table A.53 (program funding)

Nineteen percent of schools did not know how their BTAM programs were funded.

p. 49 · NCIER Claim Map

Top

Find the Perfect Training Class For You