NCIER®

Report page 38

Report page 38 with the extracted claims highlighted
Click the page to enlarge. Highlighted passages match the claims listed alongside.

Claims on this page

Evidence [V] p038-02

NTAC: objectively concerning behaviors include threats, violence, weapons, bullying (2018, p. 4)

NTAC guidance for defining the types of behaviors that might be referred to a BTAM team includes objectively concerning behaviors, such as “threatening or engaging in violence, bringing a weapon to school, bullying or harassing others, and criminal behaviors” (NTAC, 2018, p. 4).

p. 38 · NCIER Claim Map
Evidence [V] p038-03

NTAC: other concerning behavior may warrant BTAM team assessment and response

NTAC guidance also identifies a constellation of “other concerning behavior” that may warrant an assessment and response by the BTAM team, including a variety of indicators of stress, inappropriate interest in violent topics (e.g., past school attackers, weapons), interpersonal conflicts, suicidality, or other concerns that might lead to a potential harmful outcome if not addressed.

p. 38 · NCIER Claim Map
Statement [V] p038-05

BTAM teams are not intended as the primary vehicle for lower-level concerns or routine discipline

BTAM teams are not intended to be the primary vehicle for schools to respond to lower-level behavioral or mental health concerns, signals of change in a student’s well-being (e.g., depression, bullying, declining grades), or such routine school discipline issues as classroom disruption.

p. 38 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p038-07

Chapter 4 focuses on roughly 1,600 schools with an official or alternative team

In this chapter, we focus on the subset of roughly 1,600 schools in our survey sample who reported having an official BTAM team at their school or alternative school-based team that functions similarly to a BTAM team.

p. 38 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p038-10

Ninety-three percent of principals said official BTAM teams would respond to very serious behavior

Sample (N = 1401) · Schools with an official BTAM team (Figure 4.1 official-team column; N printed in Table A.35)

Ninety-three percent of principals indicated that their official BTAM teams would respond to very serious threatening or concerning behavior, such as students who directed threats toward other students or school staff, and students who made threats of or may be intending to commit mass violence against the school or school community.

p. 38 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [I] p038-13

About 80 percent of principals said BTAM teams would respond to other serious concerns

Sample (N = 1401) · Schools with an official BTAM team (Figure 4.1 official-team column; N printed in Table A.35)

About 80 percent of principals responded that their

p. 38 · NCIER Claim Map

Why inferred The sentence crosses a page break: this quote is the page 38 part and the sentence continues on page 39 (claim p039-01). Full sentence (pages 38–39): “About 80 percent of principals responded that their schools’ BTAM teams would respond to other serious concerns, such as students at risk of self-harm or suicide or students with fixations on past school violence incidents or interest in violence or extremist movements.”


Top

Find the Perfect Training Class For You