Page 78 | The State of BTAM in K–12 Public Schools: NCIER Claim Map

Fact [V] p078-01

Fig 11.1 Scenario A: Teacher 58*, Counselor 6, School administrator 29, BTAM team 0

Sample (n = 353 of 353) · Scenario A respondents (observations)

A | 58 (ringed) | 6 | 29 | 0

p. 78 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 78 Ch 11: How Are Schools Using BTAM to Respond to Student Behavior?

Fact [V] p078-02

Fig 11.1 Scenario B: Teacher 20, Counselor unlabeled, School administrator 64*, BTAM team 3

Sample (n = 335 of 335) · Scenario B respondents (observations)

B | 20 | [unlabeled] | 64 (ringed) | 3

p. 78 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 78 Ch 11: How Are Schools Using BTAM to Respond to Student Behavior?

Fact [V] p078-03

Fig 11.1 Scenario C: Teacher unlabeled, Counselor 2, School administrator 84*, BTAM team 4

Sample (n = 131 of 131) · Scenario C respondents (observations)

C | [unlabeled] | 2 | 84 (ringed) | 4

p. 78 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 78 Ch 11: How Are Schools Using BTAM to Respond to Student Behavior?

Fact [V] p078-04

Fig 11.1 Scenario D: Teacher 13, Counselor 22, School administrator 53*, BTAM team 4

Sample (n = 148 of 148) · Scenario D respondents (observations)

D | 13 | 22 | 53 (ringed) | 4

p. 78 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 78 Ch 11: How Are Schools Using BTAM to Respond to Student Behavior?

Fact [V] p078-05

Fig 11.1 Scenario E: Teacher 25, Counselor 27, School administrator 34*, BTAM team 5

Sample (n = 137 of 137) · Scenario E respondents (observations)

E | 25 | 27 | 34 (ringed) | 5

p. 78 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 78 Ch 11: How Are Schools Using BTAM to Respond to Student Behavior?

Fact [V] p078-06

Fig 11.1 Scenario F: Teacher 19, Counselor 3, School administrator 58*, BTAM team 15

Sample (n = 137 of 137) · Scenario F respondents (observations)

F | 19 | 3 | 58 (ringed) | 15

p. 78 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 78 Ch 11: How Are Schools Using BTAM to Respond to Student Behavior?

Fact [V] p078-07

Fig 11.1 Scenario G: Teacher 14, Counselor 5, School administrator 59*, BTAM team 12

Sample (n = 133 of 133) · Scenario G respondents (observations)

G | 14 | 5 | 59 (ringed) | 12

p. 78 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 78 Ch 11: How Are Schools Using BTAM to Respond to Student Behavior?

Fact [V] p078-08

Fig 11.1 Scenario H: Teacher 8, Counselor 0, School administrator 68*, BTAM team 15

Sample (n = 687 of 687) · Scenario H respondents (observations)

H | 8 | 0 | 68 (ringed) | 15

p. 78 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 78 Ch 11: How Are Schools Using BTAM to Respond to Student Behavior?

Fact [V] p078-09

Fig 11.1 Scenario I: Teacher 56*, Counselor 9, School administrator 23, BTAM team 1

Sample (n = 734 of 734) · Scenario I respondents (observations)

I | 56 (ringed) | 9 | 23 | 1

p. 78 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 78 Ch 11: How Are Schools Using BTAM to Respond to Student Behavior?

Fact [V] p078-10

Fig 11.1 Scenario J: Teacher 5, Counselor unlabeled, School administrator 85*, BTAM team 2

Sample (n = 139 of 139) · Scenario J respondents (observations)

J | 5 | [unlabeled] | 85 (ringed) | 2

p. 78 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 78 Ch 11: How Are Schools Using BTAM to Respond to Student Behavior?

Fact [V] p078-11

Fig 11.1 Scenario K: Teacher 51*, Counselor 9, School administrator 35, BTAM team 0

Sample (n = 128 of 128) · Scenario K respondents (observations)

K | 51 (ringed) | 9 | 35 | 0

p. 78 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 78 Ch 11: How Are Schools Using BTAM to Respond to Student Behavior?

Fact [V] p078-12

Fig 11.1 Scenario L: Teacher 15, Counselor 0, School administrator 76*, BTAM team 4

Sample (n = 103 of 103) · Scenario L respondents (observations)

L | 15 | 0 | 76 (ringed) | 4

p. 78 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 78 Ch 11: How Are Schools Using BTAM to Respond to Student Behavior?

Fact [V] p078-13

Fig 11.1 Scenario M: Teacher 11, Counselor 1, School administrator 80*, BTAM team 2

Sample (n = 134 of 134) · Scenario M respondents (observations)

M | 11 | 1 | 80 (ringed) | 2

p. 78 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 78 Ch 11: How Are Schools Using BTAM to Respond to Student Behavior?

Fact [V] p078-14

Fig 11.1 Scenario N: Teacher 18, Counselor 22, School administrator 44*, BTAM team 12

Sample (n = 126 of 126) · Scenario N respondents (observations)

N | 18 | 22 | 44 (ringed) | 12

p. 78 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 78 Ch 11: How Are Schools Using BTAM to Respond to Student Behavior?

Fact [V] p078-15

Fig 11.1 Scenario O: Teacher 0, Counselor unlabeled, School administrator 58*, BTAM team 13

Sample (n = 107 of 107) · Scenario O respondents (observations)

O | 0 | [unlabeled] | 58 (ringed) | 13

p. 78 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 78 Ch 11: How Are Schools Using BTAM to Respond to Student Behavior?

Fact [V] p078-16

Fig 11.1 Scenario P: Teacher unlabeled, Counselor 1, School administrator 77*, BTAM team 12

Sample (n = 734 of 734) · Scenario P respondents (observations)

P | [unlabeled] | 1 | 77 (ringed) | 12

p. 78 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 78 Ch 11: How Are Schools Using BTAM to Respond to Student Behavior?

Fact [V] p078-17

Fig 11.1 question wording; n = 1,422 low, 1,423 medium, 1,421 high-severity observations

NOTE: This figure depicts response data from the following survey question: “Which person or group is most likely to make the initial decision about how to respond to this student’s behavior?” (n = 1,422 observations for low-severity scenarios; n = 1,423 observations for medium-severity scenarios; n = 1,421 observations for high-severity scenarios).

p. 78 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 78 Ch 11: How Are Schools Using BTAM to Respond to Student Behavior?

Fact [V] p078-18

Fig 11.1 includes only respondents whose school has a school- or district-level BTAM team

Includes only those who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team.

p. 78 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 78 Ch 11: How Are Schools Using BTAM to Respond to Student Behavior?

Fact [V] p078-19

Some data labels were removed from Fig 11.1 for readability

Some data labels have been removed for readability.

p. 78 · NCIER Claim Map

Methodology

cite page 78 Ch 11: How Are Schools Using BTAM to Respond to Student Behavior?

Every Workplace Attacker Was Known: What the Secret Service Found in 50 Workplace Attacks

Ep 140: Part 2 - What a Teacher Learned from the Marjory Stoneman Douglas / Parkland School Shooting

Active Shooter Incident Management

School Safety and Violent Event Incident Management

For Agencies

Logistics

Publications

Data & Standards

Operational Tools

Library

Report page 78

Claims on this page

Fig 11.1 Scenario A: Teacher 58*, Counselor 6, School administrator 29, BTAM team 0

Fig 11.1 Scenario B: Teacher 20, Counselor unlabeled, School administrator 64*, BTAM team 3

Fig 11.1 Scenario C: Teacher unlabeled, Counselor 2, School administrator 84*, BTAM team 4

Fig 11.1 Scenario D: Teacher 13, Counselor 22, School administrator 53*, BTAM team 4

Fig 11.1 Scenario E: Teacher 25, Counselor 27, School administrator 34*, BTAM team 5

Fig 11.1 Scenario F: Teacher 19, Counselor 3, School administrator 58*, BTAM team 15

Fig 11.1 Scenario G: Teacher 14, Counselor 5, School administrator 59*, BTAM team 12

Fig 11.1 Scenario H: Teacher 8, Counselor 0, School administrator 68*, BTAM team 15

Fig 11.1 Scenario I: Teacher 56*, Counselor 9, School administrator 23, BTAM team 1

Fig 11.1 Scenario J: Teacher 5, Counselor unlabeled, School administrator 85*, BTAM team 2

Fig 11.1 Scenario K: Teacher 51*, Counselor 9, School administrator 35, BTAM team 0

Fig 11.1 Scenario L: Teacher 15, Counselor 0, School administrator 76*, BTAM team 4

Fig 11.1 Scenario M: Teacher 11, Counselor 1, School administrator 80*, BTAM team 2

Fig 11.1 Scenario N: Teacher 18, Counselor 22, School administrator 44*, BTAM team 12

Fig 11.1 Scenario O: Teacher 0, Counselor unlabeled, School administrator 58*, BTAM team 13

Fig 11.1 Scenario P: Teacher unlabeled, Counselor 1, School administrator 77*, BTAM team 12

Fig 11.1 question wording; n = 1,422 low, 1,423 medium, 1,421 high-severity observations

Fig 11.1 includes only respondents whose school has a school- or district-level BTAM team

Some data labels were removed from Fig 11.1 for readability