8 claims on pp. 17–95 (fact 8).
Over two-fifths of attackers were current or former employees of the targeted location (n = 22, 43%).
Sample (n = 22 of 51) · attackers, all affiliation types
over two-fifths of attackers were current or former employees of the targeted location (n = 22, 43%)
Over one-third of attackers (n = 20, 39%) were customers, clients, patients, or visitors with frequent or substantive contact with the targeted location.
Sample (n = 20 of 51) · attackers, all affiliation types
over one-third (n = 20, 39%) were customers, clients, patients, or visitors with frequent or substantive contact with the targeted location
A smaller number of attackers (n = 9, 18%) were current or former romantic partners or relatives of individuals connected to the targeted site.
Sample (n = 9 of 51) · attackers, all affiliation types
a smaller number (n = 9, 18%) were current or former romantic partners or relatives of individuals connected to the targeted site
Figure 1 is a pie chart of attacker affiliation to the targeted site: Current or Former Employees (n = 22), Customers, Clients, Patients, and Visitors (n = 20), and Romantic Partners and Relatives (n = 9).
FIGURE 1 Attacker Affiliation to Targeted Site
The Key Findings for Employees box states that 73% of employee attackers were currently employed at the facility they targeted.
Sample (n = 16 of 22) · current or former employee attackers (22 attacks, each by a lone attacker)
73% of attackers were currently employed at the facility they targeted.
Two attackers had familial relationships with one or more employees of the targeted location, including an estranged attacker who targeted a restaurant owned by his nephews and a psychotic attacker who fired at a bar owned by his cousin.
Two attackers had familial relationships with one or more employees of their targeted location
Data Table 1 column headers give all attacks as n = 50 / 29%, current or former employees as n = 22 / 13%, customers, clients, patients, and visitors as n = 19 / 11%, and romantic partners and relatives as n = 9 / 5%.
Sample (n = 50 of 173) · mass attacks (2016-2020) in the NTAC 2023 population from which the 50 workplace incidents were drawn
| INCIDENT DATA | All Attacks<br>n = 50 / 29% | Current or Former Employees<br>n = 22 / 13% | Customers, Clients, Patients, and Visitors<br>n = 19 / 11% | Romantic Partners and Relatives<br>n = 9 / 5% |
Why inferred table header: the column headers are printed in the table; the <br> marks the line break inside each printed header cell and is not printed text
Data Table 2 column headers give all attackers as n = 51 / 28%, current or former employees as n = 22 / 12%, customers, clients, patients, and visitors as n = 20 / 11%, and romantic partners and relatives as n = 9 / 5%.
Sample (n = 51 of undeterminable) · attackers in the NTAC 2023 population of 173 mass attacks
| ATTACKER DATA | All Attackers<br>n = 51 / 28% | Current or Former Employees<br>n = 22 / 12% | Customers, Clients, Patients, and Visitors<br>n = 20 / 11% | Romantic Partners and Relatives<br>n = 9 / 5% |
Why inferred table header: the column headers are printed in the table; the <br> marks the line break inside each printed header cell and is not printed text
Find the Perfect Training Class For You
