NCIER®

Romantic Partners Relatives

44 claims on pp. 12–94 (fact 19, statement 7, evidence 12, definition 6).

Claims about Romantic Partners Relatives

Definition [V] p012-09

Definition box: known or knowable types include employees, customers, and partners or relatives

The Known or Knowable definition box lists current or former employees; regular or notable customers, clients, patients, or visitors; and current or former romantic partners or relatives of individuals connected to the organization as common types.

Common types of individuals that are known or knowable to a workplace include current or former employees; regular or notable customers, clients, patients, or visitors; and the current or former romantic partners or relatives of individuals connected to the organization.

p. 12 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 12 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 12 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Evidence [V] p013-22

Divorce-dispute shooter: three-hour standoff with demands to reform divorce asset division

A three-hour standoff followed, during which the attacker repeatedly called dispatch demanding reform in how assets are divided during divorce.

A three-hour long standoff ensued, and the attacker called dispatch multiple times, demanding reform in how assets are divided during divorce.

p. 13 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 13 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 13 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p016-03

Some attackers' violence against partners or relatives led to protective orders

Some attackers engaged in violence directed at romantic partners or relatives, prompting victims to seek protective or restraining orders.

some attackers engaged in violence directed at romantic partners or relatives, prompting victims to seek protective orders or restraining orders against the attackers

p. 16 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 16 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 16 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Evidence [V] p016-05

Elementary school shooting by man with two-decade domestic violence history

A 53-year-old man killed his estranged wife and one of her students in her classroom, injuring another student, before dying by suicide. He had two decades of domestic violence, including threats to kill, and multiple people had filed restraining orders against him.

A 53-year-old man arrived at the elementary school where his estranged wife worked

p. 16 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 16 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 16 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Evidence [V] p016-16

Elementary school shooter: motivated after estranged wife left home three months earlier

The attacker was motivated to shoot after his estranged wife moved out three months earlier and refused his attempts to force her return.

The attacker was motivated to engage in the shooting after his estranged wife moved out of his home three months earlier and refused his attempts to force her return.

p. 16 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 16 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 16 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Evidence [V] p016-18

School shooter fired ten shots, killing his wife and a student and injuring another

At his estranged wife's classroom, the man fired ten shots from a revolver, killing his wife and one of her students and injuring another student before dying by suicide.

When he arrived at her classroom, the man drew a revolver and fired ten shots into the classroom, killing his wife and one of her students and injuring another student before dying by suicide.

p. 16 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 16 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 16 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p017-03

18% of attackers were romantic partners or relatives of connected individuals (n = 9)

A smaller number of attackers (n = 9, 18%) were current or former romantic partners or relatives of individuals connected to the targeted site.

Sample (n = 9 of 51) · attackers, all affiliation types

a smaller number (n = 9, 18%) were current or former romantic partners or relatives of individuals connected to the targeted site

p. 17 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 17 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 17 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p025-01

Nine attacks were perpetrated by current or former romantic partners or relatives

There were nine attacks perpetrated by current or former romantic partners or relatives of individuals connected to the targeted site.

There were nine attacks perpetrated by attackers who were current or former romantic partners or relatives of individuals connected to the targeted site

p. 25 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 25 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 25 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p025-05

All but one (n = 8, 89%) of these attacks were motivated at least partly by grievance

All but one of these attacks (n = 8, 89%) were motivated, in whole or in part, by a grievance.

Sample (n = 8 of 9) · attacks by current or former romantic partners or relatives (9 attacks, each by a lone attacker)

All but one of these attacks (n = 8, 89%) were motivated, in whole or in part, by a grievance

p. 25 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 25 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 25 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Evidence [V] p025-09

Two of six attackers also struck other locations, including a divorce attorney

Two of the six also attacked other locations, one targeting his wife's divorce attorney at the attorney's law office. A separate domestic-grievance attacker targeted divorce attorneys and mental health professionals who had evaluated his child during a custody dispute.

another attacker who targeted his wife's divorce attorney at the attorney's law office

p. 25 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 25 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 25 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Evidence [V] p025-10

Gunman killed ex-girlfriend and coworker at her healthcare workplace despite protection order

A gunman took hostages outside a healthcare center where his ex-girlfriend worked, shot and killed a police chief, then fatally shot his ex-girlfriend and her coworker before dying by suicide. He had assaulted and threatened her multiple times, and one protection order was still in place at the time of the attack.

In the months prior to the incident, he had assaulted and threatened to kill his ex-girlfriend multiple times

p. 25 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 25 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 25 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p025-11

Over three-quarters (78%) had threatened partners or relatives before attacking

Over three-quarters (n = 7, 78%) of these attackers had threatened romantic partners or family members and engaged in at least one act of domestic violence before the attack.

Sample (n = 7 of 9) · attacks by current or former romantic partners or relatives (9 attacks, each by a lone attacker)

over three-quarters of these attackers (n = 7, 78%) had a history of making threatening statements toward romantic partners or family members

p. 25 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 25 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 25 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p025-12

Key finding: 78% of attackers had a history of domestic violence

The key findings box reports that 78% of attackers had a history of domestic violence.

Sample (n = 7 of 9) · attacks by current or former romantic partners or relatives (9 attacks, each by a lone attacker)

78% of attackers had a history of domestic violence

p. 25 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 25 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 25 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p025-14

Two attackers had family ties to employees at the targeted location

Two attackers had familial relationships with one or more employees of the targeted location, including an estranged attacker who targeted a restaurant owned by his nephews and a psychotic attacker who fired at a bar owned by his cousin.

Two attackers had familial relationships with one or more employees of their targeted location

p. 25 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 25 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 25 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Evidence [V] p025-17

One domestic-grievance attacker targeted divorce attorneys and child-custody evaluators

One attacker motivated by a domestic grievance did not target a romantic partner's current workplace, but instead targeted the attorneys handling his divorce and the mental health professionals who had evaluated his child during a custody dispute.

One attacker motivated by a domestic grievance did not target a romantic partner's current place of employment, but instead targeted attorneys handling his divorce and mental health professionals who had conducted evaluations of the attacker's child during a custody dispute.

p. 25 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 25 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 25 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Evidence [V] p025-18

43-year-old gunman took two hostages outside his ex-girlfriend's healthcare workplace

In a case example, a 43-year-old gunman armed with a shotgun and a pistol took two hostages in the woods outside the healthcare center where his ex-girlfriend worked.

A 43-year-old gunman, armed with a shotgun and a pistol, took two hostages in the woods outside of a healthcare center where his ex-girlfriend worked.

p. 25 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 25 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 25 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p026-18

Romantic partner and relative attackers showed depression at 44%

Attackers who targeted romantic partners or family members had higher rates of depression (n = 4, 44%) than others.

Sample (n = 4 of 9) · attacks by current or former romantic partners or relatives (9 attacks, each by a lone attacker)

this group had higher rates of depression (n = 4, 44%) and suicidal ideation (n = 3, 33%) than others

p. 26 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 26 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 26 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p026-19

Romantic partner and relative attackers showed suicidal ideation at 33%

The same group had higher rates of suicidal ideation (n = 3, 33%) than others.

Sample (n = 3 of 9) · attacks by current or former romantic partners or relatives (9 attacks, each by a lone attacker)

and suicidal ideation (n = 3, 33%) than others

p. 26 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 26 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 26 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Definition [V] p030-06

Individuals eliciting concern include employees, customers, and relatives

An individual eliciting concern can be a current or former employee, a customer, client, patient, or visitor, or a current or former romantic partner or relative of someone connected to the workplace.

An individual eliciting concern can be: a current or former employee; a customer, client, patient, and visitor; or a current or former romantic partner or relative of an individual connected to the workplace.

p. 30 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 30 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 30 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Statement [V] p041-06

Policy should define who is in BTAM scope and what actions may follow

The policy should articulate who is subject to assessment and what actions may be taken, which may include current and former employees, frequent customers, and relatives.

Articulate who will be subject to a behavioral threat assessment and what actions may be taken during the BTAM process.

p. 41 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 41 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 41 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Statement [I] p041-14

BTAM scope may cover employees, former employees, customers, visitors, partners, and relatives

Program scope may include current and former employees; frequent or notable customers, clients, patients, and visitors; or current or former romantic partners or relatives of individuals connected to the workplace.

This may include current and former employees; frequent or notable customers, clients, patients, and visitors; or current or former romantic partners or relatives of individuals connected to the workplace.

p. 41 · NCIER Claim Map

Why inferred Typed statement, not conjecture: the 'may'/'might'/'can' is permissive guidance (what a team may do), not speculation about what is the case.

Report page 41 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 41 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Definition [V] p052-01

Definition: intimate partner violence (IPV)

IPV is abuse or aggression in a romantic relationship, including current and former spouses and dating partners, and can include physical, psychological, or sexual violence and stalking.

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is abuse or aggression that occurs in the context of a romantic relationship

p. 52 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 52 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 52 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Definition [V] p052-26

IPV can include physical violence, psychological aggression, sexual violence, and stalking

Intimate partner violence can include physical violence, psychological aggression, sexual violence, stalking, and other behaviors.

IPV can include physical violence, psychological aggression, sexual violence, stalking, and other behaviors.

p. 52 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 52 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 52 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Statement [I] p067-01

Family and community members may give critical insight in crises

Members of the community, such as family and friends, may offer critical insight into an individual's behavior and circumstances, especially during crises.

Members of the community (e.g., family, friends) may offer critical insight into an individual's behavior and current circumstances

p. 67 · NCIER Claim Map

Why inferred Descriptive 'may' about information sources; typed as guidance.

Report page 67 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 67 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Statement [I] p067-03

Personnel-file emergency contacts may identify family and community members

For current or former employees, emergency contacts in personnel files may help identify family and community members with personal information about the individual.

emergency contacts listed in their personnel file may help BTAM teams identify family and community members who have personal information about the individual

p. 67 · NCIER Claim Map

Why inferred Descriptive 'may' about a practical route; typed as guidance.

Report page 67 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 67 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Definition [V] p068-04

Home life covers family dysfunction, abuse and domestic violence

Home life refers to family dynamics or home environments that negatively impact an individual, including discord, abuse, drug use, criminality, and domestic violence.

Family dynamics or home environments that negatively impact an individual, including family discord, abuse, drug use, criminality, domestic violence

p. 68 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 68 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 68 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Definition [V] p068-08

Interpersonal difficulties are strained or conflicted relationships

Interpersonal difficulties are a pattern of strained or conflicted relationships with family, partners, friends, coworkers, neighbors, or community members.

A pattern of strained or conflicted relationships with family members, romantic partners, friends, coworkers, classmates, neighbors, or other members of the community

p. 68 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 68 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 68 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Statement [I] p071-08

Weapon access may include relatives' or friends' homes

Access to weapons may include weapons readily available at home, secured or unsecured, as well as weapons in the homes of relatives or friends.

Access to weapons may include those that are readily available to the individual in their home, whether secured or unsecured, as well as those accessible in the homes of relatives or friends

p. 71 · NCIER Claim Map

Why inferred Descriptive 'may include' scope statement; typed as guidance.

Report page 71 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 71 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Statement [V] p078-06

Eligible ERPO petitioners include law enforcement, family, partners, clinicians

Eligible petitioners for an ERPO may include law enforcement, family members, romantic partners, and clinicians, depending on state law.

Eligible petitioners for an ERPO may include law enforcement, family members, romantic partners, and clinicians.

p. 78 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 78 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 78 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Statement [V] p083-09

Organizations face unique challenges managing non-employees of concern

Organizations face unique challenges identifying, assessing, and managing individuals of concern not employed by them, including customers, clients, patients, visitors, and spouses or relatives of people connected to the workplace.

Organizations face unique challenges when trying to identify, assess, and manage individuals of concern that are not employed by the organization, including customers, clients, patients, visitors, and spouses or relatives of individuals connected to the workplace.

p. 83 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 83 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 83 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p094-21

School as location: all 2%, employees 0%, customers 0%, partners/relatives 11%

Data Table 1 reports a school as the location in 2% of all attacks (n = 50), 0% of attacks by current or former employees (n = 22), 0% by customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 19), and 11% by romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 50 | 22 | 19 | 9 by column) · Data Table 1 columns: all attacks 50 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 19 | partners and relatives 9

School | 2% | 0% | 0% | 11%

p. 94 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 94 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 94 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p094-26

Domestic grievance motive: all 22%, employees 14%, customers 5%, partners/relatives 78%

Data Table 1 reports a domestic grievance (a sub-row of grievance) as a motive in 22% of all attacks (n = 50), 14% of attacks by current or former employees (n = 22), 5% by customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 19), and 78% by romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 50 | 22 | 19 | 9 by column) · Data Table 1 columns: all attacks 50 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 19 | partners and relatives 9

Domestic | 22% | 14% | 5% | 78%

p. 94 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 94 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 94 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page

Top

Find the Perfect Training Class For You