NCIER®

Intervention Count

58 claims on pp. 82–109 (fact 44, statement 2, conclusion 2, conjecture 1, definition 9).

Claims about Intervention Count

Fact [I] p082-24

Many top interventions were selected by large majorities of respondents

selected by large majorities of respondents (keeping in mind that principals could—and would be expected to—select multiple interventions that could be part of a holistic intervention plan in response to a particular incident).

p. 82 · NCIER Claim Map

Why inferred The sentence crosses a page break: this quote is the page 82 part and the sentence begins on page 81. Full sentence (pages 81–82): “Many were selected by large majorities of respondents (keeping in mind that principals could—and would be expected to—select multiple interventions that could be part of a holistic intervention plan in response to a particular incident).”

Report page 82 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 82 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p086-06

Vast majority of schools responded to all scenarios using multiple interventions

we found that the vast majority of schools responded to all scenarios using multiple interventions, which is consistent with the practice of building an individualized intervention plan to respond to student behavior.

p. 86 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 86 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 86 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p086-08

Elementary median: four interventions for Scenario A, five for Scenario B

the typical (median) school reported implementing four interventions in response to Scenario A (history of misbehavior) and five interventions in response in Scenario B (history of misbehavior, physical altercation).

p. 86 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 86 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 86 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p086-09

Typical school responded to most severe Scenario H with seven interventions

At the other end of the spectrum, the typical school responded to Scenario H (history of misbehavior, physical altercation, explicit threat, history of violence, bullying, weapon), the most severe scenario, with seven interventions.

p. 86 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 86 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 86 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p086-11

Except a few schools, schools respond with a handful of interventions, usually three to eight

Figure 11.5 also shows that—with the exception of a small number of schools that responded to even low- or medium-level incidents with a large number of interventions—schools tend to respond to concerning situations with a handful of interventions (usually somewhere between three and eight, depending on the specific scenario).

p. 86 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 86 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 86 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Conclusion [V] p086-12

Principals did not report using all 16 interventions for every incident (tailoring evidence)

The fact that principals did not report that their schools would respond to every incident with all 16 interventions provides further evidence that schools are tailoring their interventions to the specifics of indi-

p. 86 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 86 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 86 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Conclusion [V] p087-25

Schools are not blindly responding to all scenarios with all available tools

In other words, even though we know schools have many options available to them (see Figure 9.1), schools are not blindly responding to all scenarios by throwing all available tools at any particular case.

p. 87 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 87 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 87 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Statement [V] p087-26

Schools typically use multiple interventions, raising the question of which compose the response

Because schools typically use multiple interventions to respond to an incident, this raises questions about what specific interventions tend to compose the list of actions that schools take in response to an incident.

p. 87 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 87 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 87 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p088-02

Average elementary school Scenario H: one target/victim support, one supportive discipline, one...

That is, the average elementary school would take one intervention focused on target/victim support, one intervention focused on supportive discipline, one intervention focused on notification, one restrictive intervention, and three support-focused interventions.

p. 88 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 88 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 88 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Definition [I] p088-33

Figure 11.6 shows the mean number of interventions schools reported taking per scenario

interventions that schools reported taking in response to each scenario presented.

p. 88 · NCIER Claim Map

Why inferred The sentence crosses a page break: this quote is the page 88 part and the sentence begins on page 87. Full sentence (pages 87–88): “Figure 11.6 shows the mean number of interventions that schools reported taking in response to each scenario presented.”

Report page 88 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 88 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p109-05

Scenario responses reveal schools are not overly relying on any single intervention

Responses to scenario-based questions in particular reveal that schools are not overly relying on any single intervention to address student needs, which is appropriate for the types of complex cases often referred to BTAM teams.

p. 109 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 109 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 109 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page

Top

Find the Perfect Training Class For You