NCIER®
CONTACT US

Report page 119

21 claims on this page · The State of Behavioral Threat Assessment and Management in K–12 Public Schools: Findings from a 2025 American School Leader Panel Survey

Report page 119 with the extracted claims highlighted
Click the page to enlarge. Highlighted passages match the claims listed alongside.

Claims on this page

Fact [V] p119-01

Table A.17 Secondary, Assess nee…: I 30.3, J 47.3, K 24.4, L 16.5, M 48.4, N 61.1, O 58.3, P 44.0

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Assess need for or start programming to help the student build relationships with trusted adults (for example, regular check-ins; adult mentoring) | 30.3 | 47.3 | 24.4 | 16.5 | 48.4 | 61.1 | 58.3 | 44.0

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 119 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Fact [V] p119-02

Table A.17 Secondary, Assess nee…: I 25.8, J 25.8, K 18.7, L 12.2, M 36.1, N 44.2, O 33.4, P 31.0

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Assess need for or start skill-building services (e.g., social skills- or leadership skills-building program) | 25.8 | 25.8 | 18.7 | 12.2 | 36.1 | 44.2 | 33.4 | 31.0

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 119 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Fact [V] p119-03

Table A.17 Secondary, Assess nee…: I 16.4, J 21.3, K 23.1, L 12.4, M 20.4, N 46.4, O 31.5, P 32.4

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Assess need for or start programming to help the student build peer relationships and engagement (for example, friend or peer mentor groups) | 16.4 | 21.3 | 23.1 | 12.4 | 20.4 | 46.4 | 31.5 | 32.4

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 119 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Fact [V] p119-04

Table A.17 Secondary, Assess need for or…: I 37.2, J 9.9, K 2.2, L 1.8, M 8.3, N 11.5, O 12.0, P 8.2

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Assess need for or start individualized academic or vocational programming | 37.2 | 9.9 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 8.3 | 11.5 | 12.0 | 8.2

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 119 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Fact [V] p119-05

Table A.17 Secondary, Assess need for…: I 33.7, J 8.0, K 2.3, L 3.7, M 29.2, N 13.9, O 14.2, P 12.7

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Assess need for or start special education or disability supports | 33.7 | 8.0 | 2.3 | 3.7 | 29.2 | 13.9 | 14.2 | 12.7

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 119 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Fact [V] p119-06

Table A.17 Secondary, Assess nee…: I 21.4, J 68.1, K 18.2, L 20.8, M 56.1, N 81.9, O 70.6, P 61.8

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Assess need for or start mental health counseling or care | 21.4 | 68.1 | 18.2 | 20.8 | 56.1 | 81.9 | 70.6 | 61.8

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 119 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Fact [V] p119-07

Table A.17 Secondary, Assess need for…: I 4.1, J 68.1, K 2.0, L 4.6, M 6.5, N 13.4, O 16.0, P 8.8

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Assess need for or start substance use treatment | 4.1 | 68.1 | 2.0 | 4.6 | 6.5 | 13.4 | 16.0 | 8.8

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 119 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Fact [V] p119-08

Table A.17 Secondary, Assess need fo…: I 12.3, J 40.9, K 4.5, L 12.3, M 27.3, N 49.6, O 46.0, P 37.6

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Assess need for or start family support and intervention programming for the student and their family | 12.3 | 40.9 | 4.5 | 12.3 | 27.3 | 49.6 | 46.0 | 37.6

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 119 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Fact [V] p119-09

Table A.17 Secondary, Temporary rem…: I 7.9, J 60.3, K 9.2, L 56.1, M 48.0, N 26.6, O 51.7, P 72.9

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Temporary removal from school (suspension) | 7.9 | 60.3 | 9.2 | 56.1 | 48.0 | 26.6 | 51.7 | 72.9

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 119 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Fact [V] p119-10

Table A.17 Secondary, Law enforcemen…: I 4.7, J 32.4, K 3.8, L 26.4, M 12.8, N 25.4, O 51.7, P 52.7

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Law enforcement action (for example, arrest), civil or criminal legal proceedings | 4.7 | 32.4 | 3.8 | 26.4 | 12.8 | 25.4 | 51.7 | 52.7

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 119 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Fact [V] p119-11

Table A.17 Secondary, Permanent rem…: I 3.0, J 12.2, K 3.3, L 11.1, M 8.2, N 12.0, O 23.9, P 18.6

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Permanent removal from school (expulsion, transfer to an alternative school) | 3.0 | 12.2 | 3.3 | 11.1 | 8.2 | 12.0 | 23.9 | 18.6

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 119 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Fact [V] p119-16

Table A.18 Elementary, No: A 72.8, B 45.4, C 44.8, D 22.2, E 15.0, F 8.6, G 13.4, H 4.7

Sample (N = 350 | 326 | 126 | 142 | 130 | 114 | 119 | 589 by column) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team whose multi-person team would not make the initial decision (Table A.18 scenario columns A-H)

No | 72.8 | 45.4 | 44.8 | 22.2 | 15.0 | 8.6 | 13.4 | 4.7

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 119 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Fact [V] p119-17

Table A.18 Elementary, Yes: A 27.2, B 54.6, C 55.2, D 77.8, E 85.0, F 91.4, G 86.6, H 95.3

Sample (N = 350 | 326 | 126 | 142 | 130 | 114 | 119 | 589 by column) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team whose multi-person team would not make the initial decision (Table A.18 scenario columns A-H)

Yes | 27.2 | 54.6 | 55.2 | 77.8 | 85.0 | 91.4 | 86.6 | 95.3

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 119 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Fact [V] p119-21

Table A.18 note: Only respondents who said their school- or district-level multi-person BTAM team wo

Only respondents who said their school- or district-level multi-person BTAM team would not make the initial decision about how to respond to a student’s behavior saw this question.

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map

cite page 119 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies


Top

Find the Perfect Training Class For You

Learn More