NCIER®

Report page 123

Report page 123 with the extracted claims highlighted
Click the page to enlarge. Highlighted passages match the claims listed alongside.

Claims on this page

Fact [V] p123-01

Table A.25 0 to 1 school year(s): 13.0 (official + other teams); 12.8 (official only)

Sample (N = 919 | 867 by column) · Table A.25 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only

0 to 1 school year(s) (newly implemented) | 13.0 | 12.8

p. 123 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p123-02

Table A.25 2 to 4 school years: 52.9 (official + other teams); 53.8 (official only)

Sample (N = 919 | 867 by column) · Table A.25 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only

2 to 4 school years | 52.9 | 53.8

p. 123 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p123-03

Table A.25 5 to 8 school years: 21.4 (official + other teams); 21.5 (official only)

Sample (N = 919 | 867 by column) · Table A.25 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only

5 to 8 school years | 21.4 | 21.5

p. 123 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p123-04

Table A.25 9 to 12 school years: 6.5 (official + other teams); 5.7 (official only)

Sample (N = 919 | 867 by column) · Table A.25 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only

9 to 12 school years | 6.5 | 5.7

p. 123 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p123-07

Table A.25 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team...

Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) and that their team was using (1) a named model that we listed, (2) an “Other” model, or (3) a locally developed model saw this question.

p. 123 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p123-08

Table A.25 note: The question stem was autofilled based on the respondent’s answer to the questio...

The question stem was autofilled based on the respondent’s answer to the question about what specific BTAM program they were using.

p. 123 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p123-09

Table A.26 Implemented as originally designed: 47.4 (official + other teams); 47.3 (official only)

Sample (N = 468 | 445 by column) · Table A.26 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only

We have implemented the program as it was originally designed and specified by the developers | 47.4 | 47.3

p. 123 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p123-10

Table A.26 Changed form, kept core functions: 33.0 (official + other teams); 32.7 (official only)

Sample (N = 468 | 445 by column) · Table A.26 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only

We have made changes to the program’s form (e.g., related to materials, staffing, specification of protocols, etc.), while maintaining its core functions related to assessing and managing threats | 33.0 | 32.7

p. 123 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p123-11

Table A.26 Changed core functions: 1.3 (official + other teams); 1.3 (official only)

Sample (N = 468 | 445 by column) · Table A.26 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only

We have made changes that directly modified the program’s core functions related to assessing and managing threats | 1.3 | 1.3

p. 123 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p123-12

Table A.26 I don’t know if we have made changes: 18.3 (official + other teams); 18.7 (official only)

Sample (N = 468 | 445 by column) · Table A.26 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only

I don’t know if we have made changes | 18.3 | 18.7

p. 123 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p123-14

Table A.26 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team...

Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) and that their team was using (1) a named model that we listed or (2) an “Other” model saw this question.

p. 123 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p123-15

Table A.26 note: The question stem was auto-filled based on the respondent’s answer to the questi...

The question stem was auto-filled based on the respondent’s answer to the question about what specific BTAM program they were using.

p. 123 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p123-16

Table A.27 Reduced recommended personnel (resource/staff constraints): 39.5 (official + other tea...

Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)

We reduced the number of recommended personnel serving on the team due to resource or staff constraints | 39.5 | 40.4

p. 123 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p123-17

Table A.27 Reduced recommended personnel (community concerns/context): 6.5 (official + other team...

Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)

We reduced the number of recommended personnel serving on the team due to community concerns or context | 6.5 | 5.3

p. 123 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p123-18

Table A.27 Added personnel beyond recommended: 29.2 (official + other teams); 29.6 (official only)

Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)

We added personnel to our team beyond the recommended personnel | 29.2 | 29.6

p. 123 · NCIER Claim Map

Top

Find the Perfect Training Class For You