Work Performance

Service member's stressors: chronic pain, ill loved one, peer harassment, work reprimands

In the year before the attack, the service member experienced chronic pain from a motorcycle accident, a loved one's ailing health, harassment from peers, and numerous work reprimands and citations for poor performance and tardiness.

Within the year prior to the attack, the attacker experienced multiple stressors, including chronic pain resulting from a motorcycle accident, the ailing health of a loved one, harassment from peers, and numerous reprimands and citations at work due to poor performance and tardiness.

• Bullying Harassment
• Stressors
• Work Performance

cite page 15 The Attackers

Six of the 16 current employee attackers were in good standing

Of the 16 attackers currently employed at the targeted site, six were in good standing with their employers.

six were in good standing with their employers

• Current Former Employees
• Work Performance

cite page 20 Current or Former Employees

Eight attackers had substantive work performance issues

Eight attackers had substantive performance issues at work, resulting in disciplinary action for all but one.

Eight attackers had substantive performance issues at work, resulting in disciplinary action for all but one.

• Current Former Employees
• Work Performance

cite page 20 Current or Former Employees

Performance issues included mistakes, safety violations, tardiness, and absences

Performance issues included frequent or substantive work mistakes, safety violations, tardiness, and excessive or unexcused absences. Discipline ranged from complaints and reprimands to termination.

they included frequent or substantive work mistakes, safety violations, tardiness, and excessive or unexcused absences

• Termination Handling
• Work Performance

cite page 20 Current or Former Employees

Performance information was not found for eight employee attackers

Information on performance was not found for eight employee attackers.

Information on performance was not found for eight employee attackers.

• Work Performance

cite page 20 Current or Former Employees

Table 5: performance and conduct of employee attackers

Table 5 gives work performance (good standing 6, 27%; substantive issues 8, 36%; unknown 8, 36%) and behavioral conduct (good standing 8, 36%; substantive issues 10, 45%, of which toxicity 7, 32%; unknown 4, 18%) of employee attackers.

Sample (N = 22) · current or former employee attackers (22 attacks, each by a lone attacker)

Table 5: Performance and Conduct

• Behaviors Of Concern
• Work Performance

cite page 20 Current or Former Employees

Employee attackers' work performance was mixed (Table 5)

The report describes the work performance of employee attackers as mixed, as shown in Table 5.

The work performance for employee attackers was mixed, as illustrated in Table 5.

• Current Former Employees
• Work Performance

cite page 20 Current or Former Employees

Disciplinary actions ranged from complaints and reprimand letters to termination

Disciplinary actions taken against employee attackers with performance issues ranged from complaints and letters of reprimand to termination.

Disciplinary actions ranged from complaints and letters of reprimand to termination.

• Disciplinary Practices
• Work Performance

cite page 20 Current or Former Employees

Table 5: 6 employee attackers (27%) were in good standing on work performance

Table 5 reports that 6 employee attackers (27%) were in good standing on work performance.

Sample (n = 6 of 22) · current or former employee attackers (22 attacks, each by a lone attacker)

Good standing | 6 | 27%

• Current Former Employees
• Work Performance

cite page 20 Current or Former Employees

Table 5: 8 employee attackers (36%) had substantive work performance issues

Table 5 reports that 8 employee attackers (36%) had substantive work performance issues.

Sample (n = 8 of 22) · current or former employee attackers (22 attacks, each by a lone attacker)

Substantive issues | 8 | 36%

• Current Former Employees
• Work Performance

cite page 20 Current or Former Employees

Table 5: work performance was unknown for 8 employee attackers (36%)

Table 5 reports that work performance was unknown for 8 employee attackers (36%).

Sample (n = 8 of 22) · current or former employee attackers (22 attacks, each by a lone attacker)

Unknown | 8 | 36%

• Current Former Employees
• Work Performance

cite page 20 Current or Former Employees

Employee had numerous rule violations, including a safety violation the day before

The employee had numerous rule violations on his record, including a safety violation from one day earlier.

The employee had numerous rule violations on his record, including a safety violation from one day prior.

• Disciplinary Practices
• Work Performance

cite page 21 Current or Former Employees

Gunman was described as an excellent employee who complained of coworker harassment

According to neighbors and police, he was an excellent employee who had never missed work before these absences, but he complained of being harassed by at least one coworker.

According to neighbors and police, the subject was an excellent employee who had never missed work prior to these absences, but he complained that he was being harassed by at least one coworker.

• Bullying Harassment
• Work Performance

cite page 22 Current or Former Employees

Hypothetical employee: supervisor asked in a meeting what was happening

In the low-threshold scenario, the employee's supervisor asked the employee in a recent meeting what was happening.

In a recent meeting, the employee's supervisor asked the employee what was happening.

• Behaviors Of Concern
• Work Performance

cite page 54 Step 4: Identify and Process Reports of Concerning Behavior

Hypothetical employee: denied any problems with his recent performance

The employee said he did not know what the supervisor meant by the question and denied seeing any problems with his recent performance.

The employee remarked that he did not know what the supervisor meant by the question and denied seeing any problems with his recent performance.

• Behaviors Of Concern
• Work Performance

cite page 54 Step 4: Identify and Process Reports of Concerning Behavior